If you do not consider yourself to be a ‘professional’ photographer, what do you think you need to do or achieve for this? If that is not something you desire or aspire to, how would you like to be referred to, and how will you achieve that?
I have reflected on this throughout my career, but when is it acceptable to classify myself as a ‘professional’ photographer? In basic terms the definition of an amateur is;
· ‘a person who engages in a study, or other activity for pleasure rather than financial benefit; a person who admires something; devotee; fan’.
In contrast, the definition of the term professional is:
· ‘following an occupation as a means of livelihood or for gain’.
So where do I place myself within this category? Or is it possible to be categorised as both?
I have spent years working as a commercial photographer taking on client briefs to build my skills and technical ability. However, during my studies for the MA Photography I feel an entirely new window has been opened for me in the art of taking photographs, using this medium as a powerful tool to highlight issues and spark a conversation, backed by research and a deeper level of understanding. There is the opportunity to experiment with tools and techniques, being bold and expressive.
Currently, I view my professional photography as a very separate entity to my personal projects. Studying for the MA is encouraging me to develop new skills, and I am thoroughly enjoying the opportunity to experiment with photography beyond aesthetics. Aside from the fact that art in general is hugely subjective and largely based on personal preference, I don't think I'll get to caught up in labeling my practice with the camera!
TEASDALE, Sara. 1884. 'Poems'. poets.org. New York. Available at: https://poets.org/poem/there-will-come-soft-rains [Accessed: 20/03/23]
Dictionary. 'Dictionary.com'. Available at: https://www.dictionary.com/ [Accessed: 20/03/23]
コメント